Some people don't like MVHR because it uses power for the fans and/or because there is some noise (and sometimes a lot more than there should be - see What can go wrong with MVHR). You can ventilate effectively with natural ventilation, but you will waste heat unless it is limited according to need. This is also possible - such as the humidity triggered system from Aereco that I wrote about a couple of years ago. (How much ventilation do you need?). However, it is nice to be able to have more ventilation than absolutely necessary without wasting heat which is where heat recovery comes in. So can you have heat recovery without mechanical ventilation? Apparently so, at least according to Ventive. They call it PVHR - passive ventilation with heat recovery. I expect to learn more about this on Tue. 13th October at the Open Eco Homes follow up event on Air Tightness and Ventilation In the meantime I am visiting another two homes with MVHR next weekend one of which is a retrofit, though not quite like ours I think.
My only gripe about MVHR is how expensive it is to change the filters. In our house I do this every 6 months but I don't put new ones in every time. The inlet filter is always the worst in our house, because of traffic outside and I usually throw that one out. The outlet filter, which cleans the air going out of the house, is not so bad so I get the worst off with the vacuum cleaner, then swap that into the inlet and put a clean one in the outlet. That means I need just one new set each year. The residents at Lingley Court clean theirs by washing it under the tap once a month. If you have an MVHR system I would be interested to hear what you do.
Incidentally, the main reason for the MVHR filters is to keep the heat exchange surfaces clean. However, the fact that they also improve our air quality is a big plus. You can find out more about what it is like to live with an MVHR system here.
Typo: "air tightness does now have to mean"
ReplyDelete